Scaling Operations Checklist: 15 Critical Questions for Growing Installers
A practical self-assessment tool to identify operational gaps before they become growth barriers
How to Use This Assessment
Answer each question honestly based on your current operations, not how you hope things work. For each 'no' answer, review what that gap typically costs businesses at scale and what addressing it enables.
This isn't about achieving perfection before growing-it's about understanding which limitations will become critical bottlenecks at higher volume, so you can address them proactively rather than reactively.
Scoring guide: • 12-15 'yes' answers: Strong operational foundation for scaling • 8-11 'yes' answers: Some gaps to address but growth is viable with planning • 4-7 'yes' answers: Significant operational improvements needed before scaling safely • 0-3 'yes' answers: Current systems will likely fail under increased load; foundational work required
Many installation businesses score 6-8 when first taking this assessment. The goal is identifying gaps early enough to fix them before crisis forces reactive changes.
Scheduling & Dispatch (Questions 1-3)
Can your scheduling and dispatch processes handle 2-3x current installation volume without proportionally increasing coordination time?
1. Can you communicate a complete job (site details, specs, equipment list, access notes, DNO status) to field teams in under 5 minutes without phone calls or long message threads?
2. When a job gets delayed or rescheduled, can you reassign teams and reallocate equipment in under 15 minutes with confidence that everyone affected gets notified automatically?
3. Can you see your installation capacity (teams, equipment availability, upcoming commitments) for the next 4-6 weeks at a glance without consulting multiple spreadsheets or people?
Equipment & Inventory Management (Questions 4-6)
Can you track and manage equipment worth £500,000+ across multiple teams, sites, and vehicles without losses or emergency purchases?
4. Can you locate any piece of equipment (inverter, battery, scaffolding tower, tools) within 60 seconds and know its status (available, allocated to job, in repair)?
5. When a job gets postponed, does your system automatically free up allocated equipment so it can be reassigned to other jobs without manual tracking updates?
6. Can field teams log equipment issues (damage, defects, missing components) from site, triggering automatic reassignment and repair workflows?
Compliance & Documentation (Questions 7-9)
Can your compliance and documentation processes handle 100+ installations per month without backlogs, errors, or proportional staff increases?
7. Can you generate complete MCS certification documentation in under 45 minutes per installation using data captured during the installation rather than manually compiling information afterward?
8. Do you have automated tracking of DNO applications, approvals, and notification requirements that prevents commissioning before approvals and ensures timely G98/G99/G100 submissions?
9. Can you retrieve complete installation documentation (photos, forms, certificates, approvals) for any job within 2 minutes when auditors, customers, or developers request it?
Quality Control & Auditing (Questions 10-12)
Can you maintain installation quality at scale through systematic, rapid auditing that catches issues while they're still cheap to fix?
10. Are installation photos and documentation reviewed within 24-48 hours of job completion (while scaffolding is typically still on site)?
11. Can you identify quality patterns across teams and installers (who has high defect rates in specific areas, which installation types have common issues) to target training and process improvements?
12. Do you have mandatory photo evidence requirements (specific shots that must be captured before installers can complete a job) that ensure audit-critical documentation is never missing?
Field-Office Communication (Questions 13-15)
Can information flow seamlessly between field teams and office without phone calls, lost messages, or data trapped on phones and paper?
13. Can field teams access complete job information (site details, specs, drawings, DNO status, special requirements) offline on their mobile devices while on site?
14. Do installation photos and data captured in the field reach the office automatically in real-time (or as soon as teams have signal), without requiring manual photo sharing or form delivery?
15. Can you see real-time installation status (not started, in progress, completed, issues identified) across all active jobs without calling field teams or waiting for end-of-day reports?
What These Gaps Cost: The Numbers
Based on data from installation businesses scaling from 50 to 150+ installations per month, here's what these operational gaps typically cost:
£25,000-45,000/month
Total cost of scheduling and communication inefficiencies (Questions 1-3) for businesses doing 100 installs/month with manual systems
£15,000-30,000/month
Equipment tracking gaps, emergency purchases, and utilization losses (Questions 4-6) for businesses managing £500,000+ in equipment manually
£30,000-50,000/month
Compliance processing overhead, delayed cash flow, and remediation of DNO failures (Questions 7-9) when handling 100+ installations with manual processes
£35,000-60,000/month
Late-discovery quality issues, pattern-driven repeat defects, and missing documentation revisits (Questions 10-12) without systematic rapid auditing
£20,000-35,000/month
Field communication gaps, data re-entry, lost documentation, and visibility lag (Questions 13-15) when field-office connection is manual
£125,000-220,000/month
Combined impact of operational gaps for a 100-install/month business scoring 0-7 'yes' answers
£1.5M-2.6M/year
Annual profitability impact-money that should drop to the bottom line but instead funds operational inefficiency
These costs are cumulative, not sequential
A business scoring 0-7 'yes' answers likely experiences multiple of these cost impacts simultaneously. Addressing operational gaps doesn't just save money—it unlocks margin that should be dropping to the bottom line.
Interpreting Your Results: What Your Score Means
12-15 'Yes' Answers: Strong Foundation for Scaling
Your operational systems are mature and ready to handle significant growth. Focus on capacity planning (teams, equipment, working capital) rather than operational process improvements. You're well-positioned to scale to 2-3x current volume without major system changes. Continue monitoring the few areas where you answered 'no' to ensure they don't become bottlenecks as volume increases.
8-11 'Yes' Answers: Growth Viable with Targeted Improvements
You have solid foundations in some areas but meaningful gaps in others. Growth is viable but will be smoother if you address the 'no' answers proactively before they become crisis points under higher volume. Prioritize the gaps that have the highest cost impact for your specific situation (use the 'typical cost of no' guidance). Plan 3-6 month timeline to address high-priority gaps while continuing to grow carefully.
4-7 'Yes' Answers: Significant Improvements Needed
Your current operational systems will struggle significantly under 2x volume. You're likely already experiencing pain from the gaps, and growth will amplify that pain exponentially rather than linearly. Before aggressively scaling, invest in operational improvements-particularly in areas where you answered 'no' that have high cost impacts. The good news: addressing these gaps typically unlocks 20-40% margin improvement even at current volume, funding further growth.
0-3 'Yes' Answers: Foundation Work Required
Your operational systems are not ready for significant scaling and are likely causing major inefficiencies even at current volume. Attempting to double or triple installation capacity with current processes will likely lead to crisis rather than profitable growth. Focus on building operational foundations before adding capacity. Consider that you may be able to increase profitability significantly by improving efficiency at current volume before growing. Many businesses discover they're more profitable doing 80 installs/month efficiently than 120 installs/month chaotically.
From Assessment to Action: Prioritizing Improvements
Looking at 7-10 'no' answers can feel overwhelming. Where do you start?
Prioritize by impact, not complexity: The gaps costing you the most money deserve attention first, even if they're harder to solve. Addressing a £40,000/month problem is worth more than fixing three £2,000/month issues.
Look for connected improvements: Some improvements unlock multiple wins. For example, implementing field-to-office data flow (Questions 13-14) enables rapid auditing (Question 10), improves compliance processing (Question 7), and provides real-time status visibility (Question 15). Look for changes that address multiple gaps simultaneously.
Consider quick wins: Some gaps have simple solutions that deliver fast returns. Mandatory photo requirements (Question 12) can be implemented in days and immediately improve documentation completeness. Others require more significant system changes but deliver proportionally larger benefits.
Plan for stages: You don't need to fix everything simultaneously. Many installation businesses improve in phases:
Phase 1 (Months 1-3): Field data capture and documentation improvements (Questions 7, 9, 12, 13, 14)
Phase 2 (Months 3-6): Equipment tracking and scheduling improvements (Questions 1, 2, 4, 5, 15)
Phase 3 (Months 6-9): Advanced workflow automation and pattern analysis (Questions 3, 6, 8, 10, 11)
Each phase delivers measurable improvements while building the foundation for the next.
Calculate the ROI: Use the 'typical cost of no' guidance to calculate what addressing each gap could save your business monthly. Compare that to the cost of improvement. Most installation businesses find that operational improvements pay for themselves within 3-6 months and continue delivering returns indefinitely.
Real Examples: How Installation Businesses Addressed These Gaps
Here's how businesses similar to yours approached common gap patterns:
Scenario 1: Strong on quality (10-12), weak on equipment (4-6)
A 80-install/month business had excellent quality processes but was losing £120,000 annually to equipment tracking gaps. They implemented simple scan-based equipment logging and linked it to their job scheduling. Within 4 months: 98% inventory accuracy, zero emergency purchases for items they already owned, 20% improvement in equipment utilization. The equipment improvements funded further operational enhancements.
Scenario 2: Strong on scheduling (1-3), weak on compliance (7-9)
A 100-install/month business had excellent dispatch processes but MCS certification was taking 3 hours per installation, creating a growing backlog and delaying cash flow. They connected field-captured installation data to automated document generation. Result: certification time dropped to 45 minutes, backlog cleared in 6 weeks, cash flow improved by 15-20 days average.
Scenario 3: Broadly weak across all categories (3-5 'yes' total)
A 50-install/month business planning to double capacity scored poorly across all categories. Rather than trying to fix everything at once, they focused first on field-to-office connectivity (Questions 13-14) as the foundation. Once field data flowed automatically to the office, they built improvements in quality auditing, compliance processing, and equipment tracking on that foundation. 12-month timeline from assessment to scaling confidently to 120 installs/month.
Common pattern: Businesses that systematically address these gaps typically see 25-45% improvement in operational efficiency and 15-30% improvement in profit margins within 12 months, even while growing installation volume significantly.
See How Other Installation Businesses Solved These Challenges
Explore detailed case studies showing exactly how solar installation companies addressed their specific operational gaps and the results they achieved. Each case study includes: • Their specific gap pattern (similar to this assessment) • Which improvements they prioritized and why • Implementation timeline and approach • Quantified results and ROI • Lessons learned and what they'd do differently No email required.
View Customer Success StoriesReal installation businesses, real challenges, real results
Next Steps: Making This Assessment Actionable
Share this assessment with your leadership team: Operations Director, Installation Manager, Compliance Manager, and CEO/Owner should all complete it independently, then compare results. Different perspectives often reveal gaps not everyone sees.
Quantify the impact for your specific business: Use the 'typical cost of no' guidance as a starting point, then calculate actual costs based on your volume, wage rates, and specific circumstances. Seeing that operational gaps are costing your business £150,000/month makes improvement a clear strategic priority.
Map improvements to your growth timeline: If you're planning to scale from 60 to 120 installations over the next 12 months, when do current systems hit their breaking point? Address those constraints before you hit them, not after.
Benchmark against peers: Talk to other installation businesses about which of these areas they've addressed and what worked. The solar installation community is surprisingly open about sharing operational lessons.
Explore solutions systematically: Whether you build custom systems, adopt specialized software, or improve processes manually, approach improvements systematically based on impact and feasibility rather than trying to fix everything at once.
The installation businesses that scale successfully are those that identify operational gaps early, prioritize improvements by impact, and implement changes before crisis forces reactive decisions.
Ready to Address Your Operational Gaps?
Book a personalized demo to see how Migrating Dragons can solve your specific challenges.
Book Your DemoRelated Resources
5 Signs You've Outgrown Your Spreadsheet-Based System
Recognize the warning signs that indicate it's time to upgrade operational systems
Read more →
The Hidden Costs of Manual Compliance Processing
Quantify what manual MCS and DNO workflows are really costing your business
Read more →
Profitable Growth: How to Scale Without Adding Overhead
Strategic approaches to growing installation capacity without proportional cost increases
Read more →
Why Your Installation Teams Are Always Waiting
Understanding and addressing the root causes of field productivity losses
Read more →